<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">I am not saying it is an American company - it was the minister who did. And yet, it is an American company. It doesn't just "happen" to be registered there. It is established under American laws and does not have any legal status regarding its constitution that would make it less American or not-American.<div><br></div><div>F.</div><div><br></div><div> <br><div><div>On 15/07/2013, at 17:36, Jorge Amodio <<a href="mailto:jmamodio@gmail.com">jmamodio@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><br><div>ICANN is not an "American company," it is an international non-profit corporation that happens to be registered in the state of California with main HQ's there.</div><div><br></div><div>
-J</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Francis Augusto Medeiros <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:register@francisaugusto.com" target="_blank">register@francisaugusto.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">You may call it a media circus, but, indeed, this is sparking a more active discussion towards an international body to substitute ICANN due its status as an American company.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
F.<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>